I just read an interesting article that compares three systems for Time Management, GTD®, Covey and DIT in some detail. What’s remarkable about the article is that I was wondering what the fuss was about. The article can be found here.
Of course, the three systems must have their differences, and of course there must be pros and cons. What I could not understand is why the writers involved were not focused less on the systems involved, and more on changing their own habits to create their own systems. After all, the systems proposed should not be taken as complete, final solutions, even for their inventors. They were created by their gurus to solve the particular lifestyle challenge that they happened to be facing in their lives.
I think the healthy way to regard the pre-packaged solutions is to follow Ludwig Wittgenstein, who said:
“My propositions serve as elucidations in the following way: anyone who understands me eventually recognizes them as nonsensical, when he has used them—as steps—to climb up beyond them. (He must, so to speak, throw away the ladder after he has climbed up it.) He must transcend these propositions, and then he will see the whole world aright.”
I think that time management solutions are a bit like this philosopher’s elucidations. They are useful up to a point, but after a user has created their own system using a variety of inputs, and based on a knowledge of their own habit patterns, they actually don’t need the guru’s advice any further.
To be fair, this should include the 2Time Management System!