A Television Appearance on Information Overload Day

A couple of weeks ago I was asked to come on TVJ here in Kingston, Jamaica to help promote the fact that Oct 20, 2010 was Information Overload Awareness Day.

The interviewers had a good laugh when one of their Blackberrys, which were in their laps, went off right in the middle of the 12 minute segment — it doesn’t get any better than that!

There were a lot of laughs all the way around, as you’ll see.

P.S.  Contact me if you’d like to interview me on your show for television, radio or podcast.

[email_link]

How Smart Should Smartphones Be?

I vividly remember the times in the past when I upgraded my personal time management system with the help of outside tools, but today, in 2010, I am stymied by the hype around smartphones.

The first upgrade occurred in 1980 when, as a teenager, I received an appointment diary from my parents.  The second occurred in 1991 when I purchased a DayRunner and the last happened in about 1996 when I purchased a Palm Pilot.

In each instance it was clear what I was doing — changing the way I dealt with all the stuff I needed to take care of, with the aid of a new tool.  In each case, I had to make some significant habit changes to get the new system to work, and I fully expect to do that when I complete the planned purchase of a smartphone in early 2011.

Or not.

I’m ambivalent, to be honest, about joining the millions of smartphone users around the world because I am suspicious that these devices don’t actually improve productivity.

Sure, they provide entertainment, and a pleasing distraction while waiting at the doctor’s office.  And they definitely are convenient.  I have carried around a knapsack of gadgets (cellphone, PDA, camera etc.) on overseas trips, and I imagine that I could replace it with a decent smartphone.

I’d also expect be the envy of my friends, as they see me watching television at the beach, or texting my friends from a bike ride in the mountains.  It’s likely to be the latest model, packed with all the miniature gadgets that their older models don’t have.

Entertainment, convenience and sex-appeal are certainly interesting and valuable things, but what do they have to do with productivity?

When I switched over to using my diary, DayRunner and Palm Pilot, I noticed that they helped me to process the demands on my time in a far more efficient way.  I saw fewer items fall through the cracks, and I made better decisions about what to do and what to ignore.  My skills at storing critical information were enhanced as I created routine backups.  Lists of stuff to do were better managed and I certainly made a dramatic improvement in the way I scheduled each day, using an electronic calendar.

These are bread and butter time management practices, and they are the ones that must change in order to experience a permanent boost in productivity.  They are not sexy in any way, but they are the kinds of activities that we use every minute of every day to process all the demands on our time.

Simply being able to send and receive email from a smaller device than ever before does not appear to me to be much of an improvement.  From mainframe to desktop to laptop to netbook to smartphone… the trend of squeezing more capability into smaller spaces has continued.  Smartphones are (the latest) clever miniatures, but just because they are the smallest of the email devices to be created up until now, does not mean that they have made a profound impact on our email productivity, for example.

In fact, the evidence is to the contrary, as the bad habits around smartphones (such as driving while texting) have more than nullified any productivity gains.

I believe that manufacturers have missed the plot.

Smartphones should leverage the fact that they bring diverse functionality together in a single unit for the very first time.

Here are some possible innovations that could improve our productivity:

#1:  Calendar Control

Given the problem we have with digital distractions, why can’t smartphones be programmed to turn off certain features depending on the activity that’s in the calendar?  For example, during a meeting the phone could turn the ringer off.

Idea #2:  Inbox Reporting

A smartphone could give us a status report on different aspects of our time management system e.g. that we have email messages that have been unread for 2 days.

Idea #3:  Multimedia Capturing

With the help of voice and handwriting recognition, time demands from all sources such as email, IM, Facebook and  handwritten notes, could be brought together into a single multimedia Inbox so that they could be processed together.

These ideas are the kinds of capabilities that are unique to smartphones, and actually could make users more productive.  There are sure to be many others, but manufacturers need to first understand that people want to be more productive in substantial ways that help them save real time.
[email_link]

A New Special Report on Time Management 2.0

For the first time in a long time, I put my pen to paper to update the “manifesto” of ideas here on the 2Time website.

In writing the special report, 8 Edgy Ideas From Time Management 2.0, I tried to pull together the best ideas I could find from the posts I have written over the past 4 years.  I also recorded an audio version and a short video introduction that you can view below.

To download the report, simply click on the icon or click here.  I’d love to hear your thoughts on it over at the page I created for comments.

Funny Smartphone Abuse

As I continue the process of deciding whether or not to get a smartphone, there are a few sites that have expressed some similar sentiments, mostly in the form of humorous rants.

The funniest of the bunch is PleaseShutUp.com, which has a hilarious collection of graphics and videos on the craziness that comes with inappropriate cellphone use.  It gives some graphical “advice” on using text messaging instead of a live conversation in critical moments e.g. giving your marriage vows, sitting on the toilet or hanging from the rings in gymnastics.

A recent post on the ZNet blog entitled “Smartphones Are Turning Us Into Idiots” is a colorful rant on the bad habits we are developing by paying more attention to the little screen on the phone than the people, or environment, around us.

They are both funny, in a smart, insightful way, and without saying it they ask the question: “Is there no end in sight?”

My Site Redesigns Are Complete

If you are a frequent visitor to this site you’ll have noticed that it looks a lot different.   This upgrade has been coming for some time, and I also made a similar change over at the MyTimeDesign website at http://mytimedesign.com.

I decided to really look for some designs that would help visitors focus on the purpose of each site, without some of the distractions I have been writing about lately.

If you have a moment, let me know what you think.

By the way, in case you have been looking for news of the next offering of MyTimeDesign 2.0.Professional, check out that site and make sure that your name is on the early notification list.  I plan to offer the program again (by application) in the next few weeks.  The group will intentionally be kept small.

[email_link]

I’m Not Crazy, But I Am Quite Alone

According to a recent survey carried in the New York Times, the number one use of smartphones is to play games.

Number 2 is to check the weather.

As you may know, I have been scratching my head wondering whether or not I should buy a smartphone, because I cannot clearly see where they have been designed for the purposes of boosting people’s productivity.

Apparently, I’m not alone — “productivity” ranks a lowly 10th on the list of smartphone uses with a puny 22%, right below “Sports.”

Clearly, the manufacturers are giving people what they want.

Or are they?

Obviously, I’m not getting what I want and neither are those companies who are buying them for their employees, who must look at research like this and wonder what the payback is for the US$100 a month they are paying in subscription fees.

Would a more intelligent design make a difference?

The article can be found here: How Do People Use Their Smartphones?

Here’s the graphic from the article.

Question and Answer Page on Facebook

I just put up a new page on Facebook in which I have an opportunity to answer questions from the general public on any topic related to time management.

I’d love to hear from those of you who have any questions that I could help answer from a Time Management 2.0 perspective, or just to hear another perspective that could be useful.

Click on the graphic or on the following link to be taken to the Facebook page — Q: time management
[email_link]

Lessons from GMail’s Priority Inbox

You may have read my prior post on the reasons why GMail’s Priority Inbox doesn’t deliver on the promises it makes (even though it is a _very_ nice innovation.) If not, click on my article entitled: Why GMail Priority Inbox Won’t Work.

I wrote a followup article for the Stepcase Lifehack website that goes a bit further, and shares some of what I have learned from looking at new technologies and how they should be incorporated into one’s personal system.

Click here to be taken to:  Lessons on Email Processing from GMail’s Priority Inbox.

Choosing My First Smartphone (for Productivity’s Sake)

If you are a frequent reader of this site you will know that I have questioned at length the unproductive practices and habits that have arisen around smartphones.

With that in mind, I have decided to start a quest to discover whether or not I can boost my productivity with a Blackberry, iPhone, Android or one of the newer devices.  I am going to share the process with readers, and I kicked this off with a new article over at the Stepcase Lifehack website, entitled:  How I’m Getting a Smartphone, While Avoiding Crazy Habits.

I may choose not to make a purchase, by the way… find out more by reading the article.

P.S. I just made a video to help describe what I’m doing by trying to make a “smartphone decision.”

Wish me luck!

Why GMail Priority Inbox Won’t Work

It seemed like good news at first — GMail has come out with a new way of helping its users to manage their information overload using a handy innovation called Google Priority Inbox.  Here’s what the GMail page describing the service has to say:

Get through your email faster

Email is great, except when there’s too much of it. Priority Inbox automatically identifies your important email and separates it out from everything else, so you can focus on what really matters.

It sounds impressive.

According to the Nick Bilton over at the New York Times, he found that it “definitely eased the pain.”  (How it did so was not detailed.)

If these claims were true, we’d be pretty lucky, because the volume of messages that the average corporate user receives averaged almost 150 per day in early 2010, and many people now get a lot more than 150 emails, text messages, Facebook messages and tweets.  Many are complaining that they they get too many message, and that they need help.

The number of late or un-returned emails testifies to the fact that users are unhappy with their email inboxes, and have complained for years that the problem must be that they get too much of it.

This new tool promises to fix that problem.

Using a new algorithm, GMail will identify which mails are more important than others and tag and categorize them in a way that allows a user to process them first.

That’s it.

I have no problem with Google’s algorithm, which I’m sure will work fine, and get better over time as the algorithm learns one’s preferences.

The problem I have is that this will do nothing to reduce email overload.  It also won’t help anyone to “get through their email faster.”

It’s not the fault of Priority Inbox, and what it’s designed to do.  It will certainly add some convenience that’s kinda nice, as all the urgent-looking email presents itself at the top of the Inbox in its own category.  I could imagine that some users will even choose to forward that high priority email to Outlook or their Blackberry so that they can process them immediately.

Certainly, important email that appears as a higher priority will receive a quicker response.

The problem lies in the rest of the email that is sitting in the Inbox — the “low” priority stuff.  The “Everything Else” that Google says is below the line in the graphic from the video. What exactly should be done with all that other email?  After quickly dispensing with those high priority items, what’s next?

The burden of low priority messages

In the beginning, ,ost users won’t trust GMail Priority Inbox to properly sort their email into high and low priority items perfectly, so the service will be of little use to them.  They’ll be forced to glance at every piece of email at least once in order to make sure that they aren’t missing something important. That’s what they do now — triage — in order to focus on the highest priority items first.

As the program gets better, (or even perfect,) they may decide that it’s so trustworthy that they don’t need to look at their low priority items at all when they are short on time.  After all, isn’t that the purpose of the program?  It encourages a new habit of working on the high priority items immediately, and punting all other messages until later… when the user has more time.

You may guess what happens next.

More time” is one of those things that has a nasty way of never coming along.  (Or maybe we just have a habit of filling up “more time” with more stuff!)  In either case, the low priority email does what is often does — it up piles in our Inbox.

As it does so over time, it creates a psychic burden as the mind starts to wonder to itself… “What’s in that pile of low priority email?  Is there something that might get me in big trouble because a low priority has become a high one due to the passage of time, or my lack of response?”

The only way to know this is to process each piece of email.  The single method that works is to deal with the time demand and/or information embedded in each and every message in a way that allows it to be removed from the Inbox entirely.  This can be done in GMail by properly tagging it so that the essential time demand or information is embedded safely in other locations in the user’s time management or filing system.

In other words, each message that is received requires a certain amount of time to deal with it, and there is no avoiding the fact that putting that time off over and over again, leads to an overburdened Inbox that people find stressful.

Unfortunately, Google Priority Inbox is actually making it easier for a user to put off processing the low priority email.  Each day, as the number of unread low priority emails increases, stress increases.  The sense of information overload expands.  Overwhelm deepens.

Google Priority Inbox will actually do the opposite of what it’s intended to do because the problem it’s trying to solve does not lie in the software that GMail or Outlook has created.  Instead, it lies in our habits.

It appears that Google does not realize that by attempting to get into the time-saving business, it is now working with people’s habits, and that the innovations that lie in Priority Inbox will encourage bad habits rather than good ones by giving them a good reason to ignore low priority messages, until they become a mountain that cannot be ignored.

Complex time management problems don’t lend themselves to simple software solutions.

While I admire this attempt, it won’t work.

P.S. I do have some quick ideas of how Google could reshape GMail so that it actually promotes the right habits, such as the Zero Inbox. I’ll summarize them in a new post.
[email_link]